tricities.com:

Richmond-

One of several Virginia Republican bills–which aims to require drug tests for welfare recipients–may be one step closer to becoming law.

The bill would require initial screening of people seeking benefits under Virginia’s Temporary Aid for Needy Families Program.   Those who screen positive would have blood drawn for more definitive tests.  Those who fail would forfeit their benefits for at least a year.

For those alarmed about illegal search and seizures, this bill might cause some heartburn.  Additionally, for those who test positive, what about their children who rely on those benefits?  Will they also be punished?  What drugs would ‘big brother’ be looking for?   If an individual is supposed to be taking rx drugs for mental health, would they be denied benefits if they were NOT taking their meds?

Would this bill be Constitutional?  Does the Federal government allow such drug testing? Where do funds come from for Temporary Aid for Needy Families Program?  Are these federal funds?

I  see a lot of problems with this kind of government intervention.  This bill might drive the libertarians nuts.

6 Thoughts to “Virginia drug testing bill advances”

  1. Pat Herve

    I see no problem with requiring drug testing to obtain benefits – they should even institute biometric screening for fraud detection. As for the Children – well, that is the decision of the parent – if the parent is taking illegal substances, the children will be taken away from them. Often times, a drug dependent parent does not properly take care of their children. Choices.

  2. Cato the Elder

    I don’t agree with the part about them having to wait a year after popping positive. I’d be willing to pony up some money for people who want to get clean and stay clean. Also, is it Junior’s fault that Mom smokes crack?

    1. @cato and Pat

      That’s my problem, its not the kids’ fault. If you take the kids away, where will they go? Kids ar only taken away as a last resort.

  3. Morris Davis

    Do members of the legislature get tested? They get government checks and I can’t say I’ve seen them do much of what most people call “work” to earn it. And perhaps drugs explains some of their erratic behavior.

  4. Apparently certain lawmakers believe the word ‘poor’ is synonymous with ‘addicted.’

    That is simply ignorant.

    There are a bunch of folks out there worrying more about light bulbs and drug testing for poor people that improving the housing market and the job market. UFB

Comments are closed.