All well and good, bizarro boy, but do not inflict your beliefs on the rest of us. 

What a shame that strange people like this are always the ones who feel that they must spread the word if elected to office.

I have decided beliefs like this should disqualify a person from office.

How many more of these clowns are Republicans going to inflict on the rest of us?

Normal thinking Republicans!! Where are you?  Make your party stop doing this!!!

Bizarro Dude Mourdock is running for the senate from Indiana.  I would think his opponent, Rep. Joe Donnelly,  would be loving life with remarks like these but we are talking about Indiana.  It isn’t known for its enlightenment.

24 Thoughts to “Richard Mourdock thinks pregnancy from rape was intended by God”

  1. blue

    Ah, yes, the corruption of the democratic party continues. No, mother this is not your democractic party, it has indeed been taken over by the goofy left and has fully infiltrated the in the bag for Obama media. Of all the subjects availble this morning for discussion, the media seeks to drown out the newly uncovered emails that prove that yes the WH did, in fact, know that Bengazi was a terrorist attack from the very beginning. Lies and coverups and -look – bears oh, my. How does one do that, well, by taking offense to a minor candidate’s perfectly doctrinal and honest answer to a question about abortion. And how do you do that, by pretending and suggesting that the sbject was rape not pregnancy or abortion or worse, that he has soo much influence over the issue other than to seek a constitutional amendment that would have to be ratified by 2/3 of the states. Horrors!.

    Democratic candidate Donnelly said; “The God I believe in, and the God I know most Hoosiers believe in, does not intend for rape to happen — ever. He goes on and it gets better- but its all about the rape. Well now that is comforting. But if you believe in the miricle of life the pregnacy and potential for abortion it is a very different subjects.

    If Romney is suspect by association, Obama is cold eyed convicted by his associations. Hippocrits

    Democrates make the argument that they want to have control over their bodies, yet they are perfectly ready to control the little stuff like, cigarettes, booze and now big gulps – which have no moral, religious or cultrual overtones and yet are more than happy to argue that abortion must not just be avaialble up to the last day of the 9th month but it must now be free.

  2. What do you expect from a state that wants to hide its buffalo parts with pantaloons?

    https://www.moonhowlings.net/index.php/2010/05/02/indiana-protects-buffalo-modesty-on-state-seal/

    Sarcasm on.

  3. Ah time for the morning blue babble…..

    I did this thread last night. Sorry. I missed your media blitz about email.

    Let me ask you a serious question. Let’s suppose the white house had full knowledge that there was a terrorist attack going on…what’s in it for them to deny that there was a terrorist attack?

    Is terrorist attack like having syphilus? Gonorrhea?

    I am not sure when someone pulls up in front of your building heavily armed that it is a terrorist attack. Why isn’t it just an attack? Are we squibbling over the use of the word “terrorist?”

    To suggest a cover up is just stupid. What’s the point? What are we covering up? What is anyone covering up?

    I think if an attack happens in the middle east, to some Republicans, especially those who want to discredit Obama, then it is terrorist. Terrorist must be the new code word for “Arab” or “Muslim.”

  4. Blue babbled:

    How does one do that, well, by taking offense to a minor candidate’s perfectly doctrinal and honest answer to a question about abortion. And how do you do that, by pretending and suggesting that the sbject was rape not pregnancy or abortion or worse, that he has soo much influence over the issue other than to seek a constitutional amendment that would have to be ratified by 2/3 of the states. Horrors!.

    Why do you consider someone running for US Senator a minor candidate? It seems like a pretty important job to me. Do you think Allen is a minor character?

    Tell me Blue, are you one of those people who thinks that God causes rape victims to become pregnant? Do you feel that you have the right to make those decisions for someone else?

  5. Elena

    The inmates are now running the asylum! Run for your lives!!!! Hey, this is what happens when you have republicans cateringto the most extreme religious wing of their party.

    Romney at least pulled the ads endorsing Murdock.

    1. Good for him. He should have and he should bitch slap Mourdock for putting him in such a position.

  6. Elena

    This “minor candidate”, if, G-d forbid he actually won, would have a voice in crafting policy for every American woman. He made a completely moronic statement. If a product of rape is G-d’s will, you cannot logically seperate the rape itself. It’s all supposedly G-d’s will, by Murdock’s twisted logic that is. Without the rape, you don’t have the pregnancy. DUH!

    On a side note, are you Jewish? I remember you attempting to correct my spelling of a Yiddish word I had referenced.

  7. punchak

    I was so sad when old, lumbering Lugar was quashed by the Teaparty.

  8. blue

    @Moon-howler

    Really, you would have posted a factual, evidence based challenge to Obama’s cover-up that Bengazi was a terrorist attack? Nope, not buying it. Others are getting to why the cover-up better than I can here, but, if you knew about previous attacks, the Ambassador’s pleas for help and concerns for the 9/11 anniversary just for starters and you also knew that you had not just refused more help but reduced what was there, you might prefer to try the surprised angle rather than admit to incompetence. Yeah, sort – you know, like getting that burning sensation when peeing and (1) hoping nobody else notices and (2) pleading innocence as to the cause.

    No Moon I do not beleive that God causes Rape anymore than you beleive in God. Snarky return button on However, I am also not as sure as you are that God does not have some influence over any pregnancy. What is allowed to happen and what is by a miricle prevented from happening are in his rule book not mine. And frankly, his rule book, to the extent it has been passed down from those who listened, is pretty clear about abortion. That’s all. In any case, Rape is not caused of God. Shame on all those who have sought to suggest that that was the discussion.

    1. @Blue, you have no idea what my spiritual beliefs are.

      If you want to believe God has a hand in pregnancy, I have no problem with that as long as you keep it personal. I do have a problem if that belief were codified into law.

      The new embassy conspiracy theory is so bogus and disrespectful–making political profit off of tragedy. The motive is still missing. Is this another Vince Foster?

  9. blue

    @Elena

    “On a side note, are you Jewish? I remember you attempting to correct my spelling of a Yiddish word I had referenced.”

    Why would that matter? Are you asking ethnically or in terms of Orthodoxy?

  10. Elena

    Romeny has not dropped his endorsement. Like I said, the inmates are allowed to run the asylum!

    It is not possible to defend Murdocks statement. In fact, most ratinal republicans are distancing themselves from his crazy belief.

    @Blue,
    Are you jewish, either by conversion or birth?

  11. SlowpokeRodriguez

    Looks like an Indiana issue to me. Oh, and when are you Democrats going to get rid of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barrack Obama, Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson-Lee, etc, etc. That’s when we’ll look into doing something about our idiots.

  12. Elena

    Slow,
    Your M.O. is always to deflect isn’t it? Aren’t you offended by his statement? Are you horrified if someone you loved, like, oh, your wife, were raped, this DB could have legislative power as a United States Senator to prevent your wife from getting an abortion? I don’t think you have a daugher, but I do. And the idea that this DB could have power over my little girls body makes me want to effing vomit.

  13. SlowpokeRodriguez

    He doesn’t represent me, so no, I don’t care what he says. If he’s saying what his constituents want to hear, than no problem. You say I “deflect” even though I’m answering a direct question posed in the posting. You, on the other hand, fantasize about “what-if” scenarios. This DB would need a lot of other DBs to agree with him………highly unlikely (Obamacare notwithstanding).

    1. I am a blog misstress. I am supposed to fantaciz4e and ask what if questions.

  14. SlowpokeRodriguez

    Ohh….then no problem.

  15. New? embassy conspiracy theory?

    What’s that one?

    Is it different than the reality of this administration actually knowing that the Benghazi attack WAS an actual terrorist attack vs a “demonstration” within a day, if not a few hours, or even real time….there was a drone overhead.

    Why would they lie? Because an attack doesn’t fit a narrative proving that Obama’s policies are effective. He’s been crowing about killing Bin Laden and reducing the threat of AQ. Even has a movie coming out. Heh. If the LAST movie incited so much rage, I wonder what THIS movie will do…..
    And so, we can’t have an actual Al Queada attack on the embassy. And questions about what was actually going on are valid. Its not political except that a politician made the decisions. Why didn’t he have security? Why was more security refused? Why was the Ambassador unprotected? Of course, he may have been involved in secret dealings. Congress needs to know what those were? Was this involving weapons that we passed to the Libyan rebels, who we now know are affiliated with Al Q?

    Obama lies to make himself look good. He’s done that for 4 years.

  16. Censored bybvbl

    Agh. Indiana – it never surprises me.

    Mourdock needs to seek the help of a good colorist. One tone hair is a good indication of a dye job. Go a shade or two lighter than your youthful color – particularly if your skin tone gives away your age.

  17. While Republicans scramble to now minimize their intrusive laws on reproduction, Democrats will will continue to highlight the extremists.

    While less than 1% of abortions are performed on rape victims, the exclusion for rape and incest remains symbolically important. Those who would outlaw abortion for rape and incest would also outlaw abortion for all reasons, restrict birth control, and other draconian intrusive measures. Those of us in the pro choice movement know what to look for and just how dangerous these lawmakers are, despite their attempts to quell our fears.

  18. @Cargosquid

    That is such a crock of crap. All presidents have suffered attacks from militants ane insurgents. It isn’t necessary terrorism.

    You have been harping on that since the instant it happened. Right wing conspiracy if you ask me. Did anyone go around blaming Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, …oh yea, Republicans did if a Democraat was in the White House.

    Here’s the deal….While the action is still going on, no one can assess the damages, much less give all 5 W’s for what really went on.

    What will you all bitcha bout if Romney wins?

    Maybe the all knowing Republicans will win both houses and the White House. Well I will expect everything to be fixed the first week, just like was expected out of Obama. i will expect a freaking miracle to occur. I will pick and be a real pain in the ass too it if isnt done.

    I am still waiting for the tea party loser candidates to work the miracles they promised in the 2010 elections. bwaaaahahahahahahahaha. They haven’t done crap! It isn’t quite so simple when you are sitting in the drivers seat. All I have heard is them blaming someone else and whining about the Democrats….still. Blah! They make me sick.

  19. This thread is about Mourdock and his stupid ignorant abortion remarks, not about attacks on foreign soil.

  20. The ADMINISTRATION has stated that it was an attack by terrorists.
    Its known that the administration KNEW it was an attack by terrrorists within hours.
    It was NOT a “demonstration.”

    And yet, for days, they continued to push the cause as the you tube video. We’re not talking about “while the action was going on.” We’re talking about lying DAYS afterwards. After intel has come in verifying the fact that this was an attack.

    But, yet again, the facts might make Obama look bad and so, you bend over backwards to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    So, when have the Tea Party candidates been in the driver’s seat? They are a minority within the House which is one third of the gov’t. Again, your blindness rejects common sense. When we win the Senate, if we have enough Tea Party people, THEN you can say that they are in the driver’s seat.

    Heck, lets get the Tea Party into the same position of dominance as the Democrats were after 2007. Yet, all I hear is that everything is the fault of the GOP.

  21. Did anyone go around blaming Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, …oh yea, Republicans did if a Democraat was in the White House.

    Well…lets see.

    Reagan didn’t cover up the attacks as demonstrations so there was nothing to blame.
    Bush I… no attacks that I remember.
    Clinton…. no cover up of attacks. He could be blamed for other things, but not that.
    Bush II…. again…blamed for OTHER things.

    So..nice try. Obama is not being blamed for the attack. He’s being blamed for the coverup.

Comments are closed.