Teachers should be seen but not heard
Teachers should be seen but not heard

The 2009  National Teacher of the Year Anthony Mullen’s famous blog post, “Teachers Should Be Seen and Not Heard” is a must-read for everyone who has children or who remotely has anything to do with education, including hiring recent graduates.   After listening to noneducators bloviate about schools and teaching without once asking for his opinion, he was finally asked what he thought. He offered the following opinion:

I am a fly on the wall sitting at a table.

 

Seated at a round table are three state governors, one state senator, a Harvard professor and author, and a strange little man who assumes the role of group moderator. The strange little man asks the group to talk about their experiences at the education conference. The ex governor from the South begins to talk about how the traditional school model is not working and the problem of too many teachers who do not understand what they teach. Teachers, he complains, are not prepared to teach in 21st century classrooms because they possess, in his words, “only 20th century skills.” He does not provide specific examples or elaborate upon his theory but the other guests at the table nod their heads in agreement.

A governor from the Midwest first pays homage to the governor from the South. He tells us that his “good friend “is “right on target” about teachers not prepared to teach in 21st century classrooms. The governor from the Midwest thanks the governor from the South for presenting “the best talk at the conference.” Not to be undone, the governor from the South responds by telling the governor from the Midwest that he “presented the best talk at the conference.” When both men are done patting each other’s backs, the Midwest governor complains that teachers, particularly math teachers, don’t know their subject materials. Again, the other guests at the table nod their heads in agreement. All is civil.m a fly on the wall sitting at a table. Seated at a round table are three state governors, one state senator, a Harvard professor and author, and a strange little man who assumes the role of group moderator. The strange little man asks the group to talk about their experiences at the education conference. The ex governor from the South begins to talk about how the traditional school model is not working and the problem of too many teachers who do not understand what they teach. Teachers, he complains, are not prepared to teach in 21st century classrooms because they possess, in his words, “only 20th century skills.” He does not provide specific examples or elaborate upon his theory but the other guests at the table nod their heads in agreement.

 

The third governor hails from a cold northern state but his words have a scorching tone. “The problem with schools, “he says, “is a lack of accountability. Schools need to be guided by specific core curriculum standards and data-driven assessment.” The governor continues his diatribe. “I don’t understand why schools are not managed more like businesses.” This time the guests nod their heads vigorously, not unlike those small bobble head dolls seen on car dashboards.

The next education expert to speak is the professor from Harvard. He gives a mini lesson about the role of chaos theory in education. His new order of thinking-or New Age way of thinking- argues that seemingly unrelated events occurring in the classroom (the boy coughing, the girl raising her hand, and the teacher writing on the board) when taken together form a pattern of continuity and purpose rather than chaotic or random events. The 21st century teacher must be able to recognize these events as purposeful moments in time and space because education is connected to the rest of the universe. Wow. I will forever wonder if I did something to upset a time and space continuum the next time I admonish a student for not covering his mouth while coughing. Teachers do recognize that order and disorder exist in classrooms and that educating children is often an uncertain endeavor, but we do not have time to reflect on such esoteric thoughts when breaking up a spit ball fight.

The strange little man tries to fuse all the promulgated ideas together and asks the group to consider the following question: “Where do we take education from here?”

The state senator from the West is asked to go first. She is a diminutive lady and pauses to reflect upon the question. “I think we need to consider the role of teachers in the classroom,” she replies in a soft voice. “We are headed toward a teacherless classroom and must be guided by this fact.” A teacherless classroom? I look around the table and hope one of the esteemed guests will ask her to clarify or possibly expand upon her statement. Instead, the guests just nod their heads in agreement.

The strange little man interrupts. “I agree. Technology is making the traditional classroom teacher less relevant-possibly obsolete. Soon students will be learning at home from online classes on their laptops.” I silently question who will be teaching the online classes.
The senator continues her line of reasoning, asserting how the rapid infusion of technology in classrooms is better understood by students than teachers. Teachers are best suited to facilitate the dissemination of knowledge through interactive technology rather than try to teach ideas and concepts using traditional methods. A Brave New World suddenly enters the discussion and the senator’s vision of a utopian classroom is greeted with comments such as “indeed” and “without question.”

The Harvard professor tugs at his chin with his right thumb and index finger and compliments the senator. “In the future,” he says, “students will be learning at home using their computers. School buildings and classrooms will not be the primary learning environment.” Really? Could any sane person envision millions of school children staying home and learning a full curriculum online? I foresee a stay-at-home mom or dad spending most of the day trying to keep their children away from Facebook.

The senator from the West is very pleased that her comment about technology replacing teachers is embraced by the people seated at the table. So far I have not been asked to speak or comment. I remain a fly on the wall at the table. How weird and familiar it feels to be an invisible teacher listening to politicians and academics speak about teachers and the teaching profession. I try not to move lest they notice me.

The governor from the South changes the direction of the conversation and boasts about how he personally raised test scores in his state by challenging the “status quo of education.” He forgot to mention that he lowered the passing grades for state assessment tests- a status quo practiced by quite a few states.

The strange little man grabs a large strawberry from a fruit dish and gnaws at it. I have never seen a person eat a strawberry with two hands. “I think we all agree that changes are needed, “he declares to the group.

“That’s why we are here,” the senator replied.

The politicians and academics enjoy a dessert of pastries and fruit. I can’t keep my eyes off the strange little man nibbling on the strawberry like some backyard squirrel. The group discusses the need to drastically modify classroom management and teaching practices. They talk about curricula and how children learn best when they are provided meaningful activities. We are reminded by the governor from the South that teachers must be proficient in content knowledge.
Once again the strange little man grabs the reigns of the discussion and now alerts the group of my presence. He deposits the strawberry’s calyx on a plate. I am no longer a fly on the wall at a table as the others look upon me.
“What do you think?” the senator asked.

Where do I begin? I spent the last thirty minutes listening to a group of arrogant and condescending non educators disrespect my colleagues and profession. I listened to a group of disingenuous people whose own self-interests guide their policies rather than the interests of children. I listened to a cabal of people who sit on national education committees that will have a profound impact on classroom teaching practices. And I heard nothing of value.
“I’m thinking about the current health care debate, “I said. “And I am wondering if I will be asked to sit on a national committee charged with the task of creating a core curriculum of medical procedures to be used in hospital emergency rooms.”

The strange little man cocks his head and, suddenly, the fly on the wall has everyone’s attention.

“I realize that most people would think I am unqualified to sit on such a committee because I am not a doctor, I have never worked in an emergency room, and I have never treated a single patient. So what? Today I have listened to people who are not teachers, have never worked in a classroom, and have never taught a single student tell me how to teach.”

An uneasy silence cloaks the table. The governor from the South looks at his watch, the governor from the North bows his head, the governor from the Midwest stirs his coffee, the diminutive senator stares at me, and the strange little man grabs another strawberry. One by one the lunch guests leave the table.
I return to being a fly on a wall at a table.
I wonder how many other teachers have been treated in such a manner.

Anthony Mullen

The above describes what has been happening in the state of Virginia.  Politicians and other noneducators have been making important decisions without listening to those who are down there were the rubber meets the road.  Governor McDonnell’s plan won’t do squat for anyone but him.  It is  a feel good set of nothing.  It is valueless.  It will change nothing.

A new question, what if your child’s school gets a low grade.  Will your school system allow you to take your child to an A school?  How long will the line be?  Just what are you, as a parent, supposed to do if your child is in an D or F school?  Your child is doing fine.  What should you be doing as the parent of a child in a D school?

 

Further reading:

Washington Post:  A warning to college profs from a high school teacher

Edweek.org  Teachers should be seen and not heard

 

 

4 Thoughts to “2009 Teacher of the Year: Teachers Should be Seen and Not Heard”

  1. Scout

    This and the post that preceded it highlight a complex issue that is not easily resolved – not that that condition deters incompetent politicians from trying. The education system is sub-optimal in ways that suggest that a lot would have to change at all levels to make it better. Teachers need to have at least as big a voice as members of the General Assembly (who rarely cover themselves with glory in any endeavor) but that voice needs to come from inside the classroom rather than from NEA headquarters. Everything should be on the table: length of school year, start times, teacher training (I’ve had the impression for fifty years that a lot of teachers have to spend more time learning how to teach than what they teach and that the latter is more important than the former), teacher compensation, physical plant issues etc. We need to be very wary of approaching this as a political issue (although I concede that it ultimately has to get fixed in a political environment).

  2. hmmmm…thinking here. I agree about spending more time on the HOW than the WHAT. The HOW is iffy at best. The what should be very solid. Looking at k-7 licensure, there is a lot of jack of trades involved. Content becomes more important about 7th grade certification.

    The NEA has very little input in Virginia, if any. VEA is more influential but I would say 90% of their efforts and lobbying come from the Virginia classrooms.

    In the case of “grading” the schools, :roll:, they simply haven’t thought this one through. It is definitely a “be careful what you wish for.”

  3. An addendum to the above:

    The real reform should be dismantling NCLB. It was flawed, it remains flawed. Any attempts to build reform with NCLB still in place is just begging for trouble.

    The governor’s plan piggy backs onto NCLB. We don’t need one school pitted against the other.

  4. Elena

    You know I come from a very different perpective when it comes to being a parent and an ex middle school counselor. The idea that technology can replace the give and take environment where so much of education occurs spontaneously is enough to make me feel queasy. I actually love that my kids, in their montessori class, work on basics, the teacher is critical and to imagine that there was actually a discussion about how this great future includes no teachers, no school in order to socialize, sound very unhealthy in my mind!

    I love this article, thank you Moon!

Comments are closed.