Please post here comments made be Robert L. Duecaster who also posts under the screen name Advocator on BVBL.
41 Thoughts to “Infamous Duecaster/Advocator Quotes”
Comments are closed.
Archives
Categories
Blogroll
- 9500Liberty
- Bacons' Rebellion Blogspot
- Bearing Drift
- Blue Virginia
- Citizen Tom
- Counts of Monte Cristo. The
- Derecho, The
- Dixie Pig, The
- My Side of the Fence
- My Star Journey
- NARAL Pro-Choice VA Blog
- New Dominion Project
- Nova Common Sense
- NovaTownHall Blog
- One Libertarians's Point of View by Al Alborn
- Pete Candland's Blog
- Potomac Local
- Prince William Muckraker
- PW Conservation Alliance
- PWC Moms
- PWCPolitics.com
- PWCPolitics.com
- Red NoVA
- Shad Plank, The
- She the People
- State of NoVA, the
- The Jeffersoniad
- Townhall
- VEA Daily Reports
- VivianPaige
- WDGolden.com
- You, Me and the Lamp Post
All contents copyright Moonhowlings.net
Blogroll
- 9500Liberty
- Bacons' Rebellion Blogspot
- Bearing Drift
- Blue Virginia
- Citizen Tom
- Counts of Monte Cristo. The
- Derecho, The
- Dixie Pig, The
- My Side of the Fence
- My Star Journey
- NARAL Pro-Choice VA Blog
- New Dominion Project
- Nova Common Sense
- NovaTownHall Blog
- One Libertarians's Point of View by Al Alborn
- Pete Candland's Blog
- Potomac Local
- Prince William Muckraker
- PW Conservation Alliance
- PWC Moms
- PWCPolitics.com
- PWCPolitics.com
- Red NoVA
- Shad Plank, The
- She the People
- State of NoVA, the
- The Jeffersoniad
- Townhall
- VEA Daily Reports
- VivianPaige
- WDGolden.com
- You, Me and the Lamp Post
Feds charge 22-year-old Pentagon contractor with procurement fraudBy Elizabeth Newell and Robert Brodsky [email protected] June 23, 2008 53223
The doctrine of “affirmative action” or “diversity” is so lacking in merit that those who support it can only ascribe sinister and hateful motives to those of us who understand and point out its insidious and pervasive effects on our government and culture.
Robert L. Duecaster Posted June 27, 2008 12:03 PM
Robert L. Duecaster, how does affirmative action have anything to do with skilled contracting persons? You are the one in need of an education if you are still racist in 2008. As far as this article goes, usually contracts go through several reviews according to the dollar value. In this instance there must be a major error in their checks and balances.
Contract Specialist Posted June 25, 2008 4:08 PM.
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0608/062308e1.htm
Funny how the person who posts after him is able to identify the nature of the comment.
My favorite one was when Duecaster Disaster said we should grab our “pitchforks and shovels” in response to the Board’s courageous and unanimous vote to neuter the Immigration Resolution on April 29.
I can’t pull the quote because I refuse to look at Gospel Greg’s public toilet website, but Duecaster’s way of motivating hatred was to report that he’d seen Hispanic people moving IN instead of out. Something about a mattress. Remember?
Dis. Gust. Ting.
Oh, and he didn’t of course bother to say how he knew that this Hispanic family was undocumented. Perhaps it was his sixth sense? Or, just plain old bigotry.
You know what I think.
Another veiled threat while posting as Advocator on BVBL on 21 May 2008 at 8:38 am:
Then what?
I think we should first clarify how we connect Duecaster to Advocator:
First point, his license plate abbreviates Advocator, maybe someone has the exact language. Please post if you do.
1. Advocator said on 30 Apr 2008 at 4:00 pm:
Anon2 and Riley: That is exactly why I originally drafted the Resolution to provide that every police officer, in every stop of every person, would inquire into legal residence status. Such a policy would obviate the need for cameras, probable cause determinations, and all the rest of that black hole of litigation. Why it got changed, who changed it, and why are a big mystery that’s never been adequately explained.
1. Advocator said on 30 Apr 2008 at 7:23 pm:
Legal2: No, this does not mean the Resolution is back to its original letter, as I had drafted it and presented to Mr. Stirrup. That version would have required every police officer to question every person stopped for any suspected offense about their legal residence. Now it’s up to the officer’s “discretion,” whatever that means. Any time an officer has discretion, his/her use of that discretion is subject to scrutiny for unconstitutional (i.e., racial) bias. Consequently, the possibility of lawsuits for abusing that discretion is still there.
I believe the amended policy is still stronger than what we had, since all arrestees will be checked for legal residence.
Advocator, clearly outs himself as Duecaster, even in the HSM newsletter they praise Duecaster for authoring the first resolution.
1. Advocator said on 31 Jan 2008 at 1:48 pm:
My scientific background tells me that before we accept any conclusion regarding this observation we should investigate whether or not illegal aliens have a preferred breeding season that would account for the variation.
1. Advocator said on 25 Feb 2008 at 10:54 am:
I suspect that this “housing crisis” was planned. Governments at all levels are getting into buying up foreclosed upon houses, ostensibly to offer them to low income families. It’s one more way for the gummint to gain control of property, thus control the wealth, in this country.
http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/02/25/manassas-park-you-dont-need-to-know/
Seriously, does Duecaster really believe in such a conspriacy theory?
1. Advocator said on 30 Oct 2007 at 3:33 pm:
Does anyone need anymore evidence to convince them that we are not facing just illegal immigration, we are facing an invasion? An invasion of parasites set on reducing this country to the levels of their own.
Clearly Duecaster believes this is NOT about illegal immigration, but an invasion of people with brown faces who speak another language. Don’t forget he believes the Mexican government is funding this “invasion”
How about:
Advocator said on 4 Apr 2008 at 11:28 pm:
or
Advocator said on 10 Apr 2008 at 10:40 pm:
Mr. D doesn’t seem to think much of our elected officials in Prince William County or in neighboring jurisdictions either.
Advocator said on 14 May 2008 at 1:29 pm:
It sounds like hate-speak to me. How about the rest of you guys?
How about a little more Catholic bashing? This guy seems obsessed.
Advocator said on 14 Apr 2008 at 10:34 am:
Again on Sept 12, 2008 on BVBL:
Advocator said on 12 Sep 2008 at 10:01 am:
As I’ve said before, “One way or another …”
Ugh. Is it just my house, or are other people reading these quotes out loud doing a Duecaster impersonation? My boyfriend has him nailed, and he won’t stop! Help!
Marie,
Yes! And he just said that a couple of days ago…AFTER his appointment to the task force! Are we to expect that he will be urging his fellow members on the task force to pick up their pitchforks and shovels? And be using tax payer’s money to determine if there is a “preferred breeding season”? That quote was among the worst of the quotes Elena cited in her 3 minutes in front of the board. At that time, I did not realize that gem could be attributed to the person that wrote the original Resolution. To quote NGL:
Dis. Gust. Ing!
NGL,
Let’s not make fun of duecaster. We are suppose to be better than that on anti. We don’t want to stoop to the “dark” side.
Excuse me, but who is posting as me? note the small “a” and the small “r” at 11:57.
Blog owners, I suggest that this should be a bannable offense or else no one is safe from false posts.
I happen to have been in church at the time of this post.
I agree that near copies of established monikers should not be allowed. But this could be a coincidence. Just ask them to choose a new moniker.
A PW County Resident
I did not think “a PWC resident” was you but I could understand the confusion. Maybe “a PWC resident” might want to consider a name change so they will not be confused with you.
good idea Marie.
a PWC resident, maybe you could alter your moniker just slightly to avoid confusion. Possibly citizen as opposed to resident. Your post was excellent and you deserve the proper credit!
Marie, I don’t even know who Duecaster is. Nor have I ever met Greg L., just heard of him.
Now that you have seen him, any thoughts?
The choosing of Duecaster, it’s a reflection on John Stirrup, not on the rest of the county. It’s all on Stirrup. He says he moved away from Arlington so he wouldn’t have to keep company with ethnic minorities. Well, now we know who he DOES like to keep company with. Rather than call him a racist, can I go ahead and say that the things Mr. Duecaster says are racist?
Anti-Muslim statement –
Submitted by Robert L. Duecaster (United States), May 25, 2005 at 11:16
http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/22408
A PW County Resident
Let me rephrase my last sentence in my post at 15:56 in case you interpreted it to mean that you knew Greg L and R Duecaster. I should have written……
Maybe “a PWC resident” might want to consider changing his/her moniker so he or she will not be confused with you.
I can understand why you might not want posters to think you are the same person, especially if your view points are different.
A PW County Resident,
I don’t blame you for one minute for non wanting a “copy cat” to use a name so close to yours. There’s some one that started posting a couple month’s ago using “info”. I guess we should be flattered some want to be like us. 🙂
Duecaster’s idea of America:
http://www.aclu.org/police/spying/36025prs20080717.html
Yes, Information Only, you were imitated. Immitation is the highest form of flattery, I suppose. I hope no one thinks you are doing the drive bys with those stupid news drops.
Thanks. I call those droppings “hit & runs”.
Marie, I didn’t misunderstand. I don’t even know the other’s point of view.
Information, I don’t really flatter myself to be so wise that people would want to immitate me. I just try to be open and state my opinion, hopefully with respect. 🙂
Elena, I haven’t had a chance to research but I will, I promise. I research a lot of things when they interest me.
You call them “news” drops? I thought hey were Hate Bunny Droppings? They have little to do with news, at least not in the journalistic sense. Usually “info” leaves us a 3 month old thread that was discredited 2 months and 29 days ago.
Just plain disgusting.
ThinkAboutIt said on 23 Jan 2008 at 11:41 am:
I am offended by anti-abortion bumper stickers and do not like having to explain them to my childeren.
If truck nuts have to go….then so should they.
http://www.bvbl.net/index.php/2008/01/23/an-intriguing-funding-mechanism/
A PW Resident, I believe it was an honest mistake. Let’s not give it a life of its own.
I was not implying anyone was imitating you. The imitation remark was intended for Information Only.
A PW Resident,
I hope you realize I was being sarcastic about the flattery. Trust me, no ONE/BODY would want to be me.
I’ve not seen anything disrespectful from you.
Now, as for “a PW resident”-
Pick a new name, please.
Well, I do have to admit that he/she has good taste in blog names. 🙂
Well, now we can all get on with the business of the day. That rascally issue has been resolved. 🙂
We still have freedom of speech. Really we do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELeSPqIb44M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKsl–kQ2gI&feature=related
“They have always emphasized overpopulation and irresponsible procreation as a weapon in the Culture War… ”
He should be allowed to make this arguement. There are those who explicitly state that this is their weapon and they will overcome by using it. This train of thought may be anaethema (sic) to you but it is worth talking about and exploring.
What we have is a wide range of statements which deserve consideration as stand alone comments and in a wider context. Nobody is suggesting denying this person’s right to free speech; however he should be held accountable.
The Velvets seem to think you all are doing this TO Mr. Duecaster. From an outsider point of view, it appears he did it to himself. No one is putting words in his mouth. He seems real proud of himself and very confident of his own wisdom, although I have no idea why he feels so smug.