Texas Conservatives Dominate the Texas Curriculum

Texas curriculum Revisions
Some highlights of new social studies standards adopted by the Texas State Board of Education:
  • Adds references to “laws of nature and nature’s God” to a section in U.S. history that requires students to explain major political ideas.
  • Replaces “democratic” in references to the form of U.S. government with “constitutional republic.”
  • In addition to learning the Bill of Rights, the board specifies a reference to the Second Amendment right to bear arms in a section about citizenship in a U.S. government class.
  • Requires economics students to “analyze the decline of the U.S. dollar including abandonment of the gold standard.”
  • Ensures that students learn about “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association.”
  • In teaching about the civil rights movement, students must learn about the violent philosophy of the Black Panthers in addition to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s nonviolent approach.
  • Specifies that Germans and Italians were interned in the United States as well as the Japanese during World War II, to counter the idea that the internment of Japanese was motivated by racism.
  • Requires that the history of McCarthyism include “how the later release of the Venona papers confirmed suspicions of communist infiltration in U.S. government.” The Venona papers were transcripts of some 3,000 communications between the Soviet Union and its agents in the United States.
  • In sociology, requires the teaching of “the importance of personal responsibility for life choices” in a section on teen suicide, dating violence, sexuality, drug use and eating disorders.
  • Associated Press and New York Times

    In addition  students also will use A.D. and B. C. instead of C.E. and B.C.E.  According to MSNBC:

    In addition to learning the Bill of Rights, the board specified a reference to the Second Amendment right to bear arms in a section about citizenship in a U.S. government class.

    Conservatives also included a plank to ensure that students learn about “the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, including Phyllis Schlafly, the Contract With America, the Heritage Foundation, the Moral Majority and the National Rifle Association,” …

    Why are objectives being decided by politicians?  How about professionals in the various fields of study being the leaders with a good sprinkling of teachers, psychologists (to remind everyone of age appropriateness) and parents revising the curriculum.  What you learn should not be political.  Objectives should be neutral and not based on who won the last election.  If there is a bright side, because of technology advances in the printing industry, states can tailor some of their own curriculum and Texas will not have as much influence as it has had in the past.

    The Hispanic community felt very under-represented according to the New York Times:

    Battles over what to put in science and history books have taken place for years in the 20 states where state boards must adopt textbooks, most notably in California and Texas. But rarely in recent history has a group of conservative board members left such a mark on a social studies curriculum.

    Efforts by Hispanic board members to include more Latino figures as role models for the state’s large Hispanic population were consistently defeated, prompting one member, Mary Helen Berlanga, to storm out of a meeting late Thursday night, saying, “They can just pretend this is a white America and Hispanics don’t exist.”

    “They are going overboard, they are not experts, they are not historians,” she said. “They are rewriting history, not only of Texas but of the United States and the world.”

    The curriculum standards will now be published in a state register, opening them up for 30 days of public comment. A final vote will be taken in May, but given the Republican dominance of the board, it is unlikely that many changes will be made.

    One thing not made clear in the last post about Texas textbooks is that the meetings held last week were about curriculum changes.  The textbook companies will all try to accommodate these changes.  In the past, California offset the more conservative Texas.  That has not happened because of California’s financial woes.

    What objectives are just unacceptable?  Which show political bias?  Which are welcome changes?

    (The scroll box is easier to read if you increase the size of the page to 125%  found bottom right hand corner of the page)

    New York Times has more on the story.

    Day Light Saving Time for Dummies

    Rachel Maddow and her guest debunk all the myths revolving around Daylight Saving Time.

    Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

    Basically no one saves energy. It helps business. It makes people feel good.

    Spring forward. Set your clocks an hour ahead tonight. Your computer, your cable box, your DVR will all spring forward by themselves.

    More on Daylight Saving Time

    Lyndon Larouche Thugs at the DMV

    Weren’t those people removed from setting up camp on DMV property or was that just wish fulfillment in my dreams?

    Mr. Howler had to go to DMV the other day. He has put it off and put it off because going there is akin to refined torture for him.  He prefers a root canal without anesthesia.  He came home spitting mad.  He had had a close encounter with Larouche-ites. And I had to listen to him, for hours, grousing.

    They were by the front door of DMV so you could not get in without interacting with them.  They approached him because he was wearing team attire, typical lead-in to establish conversation.   They had their usual pictures of Obama with a Hitler mustache and other ant-Obama paraphernalia attacking  the president of the United States.  They were on a tear about ‘change,’ health care, and anything else they could associate Obama.

    Mr. Howler told them to have a nice day to dismiss them and their response was that it would be when THEY got Obama out of office and gave him a knowing look.

    People shouldn’t have to go through that in order to do business with the Division of Motor Vehicles, regardless of what state they live in.  Who let these clowns back on DNV property?  Weren’t they legally prevented from being there, sort of like the [Moonies] Hare Krishna were finally thrown out of airports?

    When was the Larouche cult allowed back on DMV property?  Were they banned or  were they just on break?  Is their leader still in jail or is he a free man?  I would like to be able to conduct state business without dealing with thugs and cult members. Who knows the scoop on the Lyndon Larouchers?

    And no, I won’t apologize for calling them thugs and clowns.  They have blighted state property for too many years.  They have become poster children for those descriptors.