64 Thoughts to “Climate Change Is NOT Real!!!!”

  1. Cargosquid
    June 15, 2011 at 3:18 pm

    @Moon-howler
    Ok.

    Are you willing to accept that man MAY not have an effect on global warming as it is now being theorized? I mean, extremes like nuclear war can lead an impact….
    That any warming OR cooling may be linked to natural cycles of the Earth and Sun?

  2. Cargosquid
    June 15, 2011 at 3:47 pm

    Would you accept ANY science that this is describing?

    http://www.theclimatebet.com/?category_name=j-scott-armstrong

    http://www.forecastingprinciples.com/images/stories/pdf/ags2011congress.pdf

  3. punchak
    June 15, 2011 at 5:21 pm

    Of course climate change isn’t REAL! Nothing has changed since the earth came into being.

    Created by the Creator as the perfect place for imperfect people for all eternity.

    Yeah, I say! That’s the way it was, is, and will forever be. NO CHANGE! AT ALL! NEVER!
    EVER!

  4. Elena
    June 15, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    Cargo,
    By your standards, we should all still be driving on leaded fuel. Or, even better, we should eat anything we want because nothing we eat effects how are bodies work, or don’t work. How can anyone with common sense not accept that what we do en masse has an impact. I guess bald eagle eggs were never destroyed by DDT either!

  5. Moon-howler
    June 15, 2011 at 8:58 pm

    Bald eagles are still rather fragile. Auto emissions don’t do them much good either.

    Locust trees are also being killed by emissions. There should be a bunch of dead ones out at Silver Lake once the buses start running to Reagan Middle School, which is less than a football field away from the actual lake.

    What a screw up that place is. I finally saw the sign that said that there were no trash cans. Penny wise, pound foolish also.

  6. George S. Harris
    June 15, 2011 at 10:34 pm

    I read through this and regret that I wasted my time.

  7. Cargosquid
    June 16, 2011 at 7:36 am

    AGAIN, you are conflating normal pollution that we want to clean up with CO2 and man-made global warm. Pollution is not a theory. But AGW is.

    Why are you putting words in my mouth because I’m skeptical of global warming theory?

    Elena,
    Direct evidence has proven that leaded fuel and bad diets are not good things. Can you find anything that I’ve written that says things we do don’t have an impact? What I’m saying is that a) the impact on warming may be negligible b) CO2 has not been proven to be a forcing agent c) AGW advocates have used lies, flawed science, and politics to advance their agenda.

    Climate change is real. Global warming may be happening. Man-made global warming may not be. And, currently, many are calling for global cooling. Did we also cause that?

  8. Steve Thomas
    June 16, 2011 at 9:20 am

    ” I guess bald eagle eggs were never destroyed by DDT either!”

    The weren’t. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,202447,00.html

    Bald Eagles were threatened by loss of habitat, loss of food due to the polution being dumped routinely into rivers, buy hunting (they were once considered pests and routinely shot) and by other human encroachment…not due to a “weakening of their eggshells” by DDT.

    Their resurgence is mainly due to their protected status, tighter waste-water release policies to protect fish, the Eagles main food source, protection against human encroachment on habitat,and a change in how Americans view their national symbol (killing a Bald Eagle became “un-american”). Banning DDT had nothing to do with this, and the science is there to back this up.

    So DDT was banned. What was the result? An explosion in mosquito-bourne diseases such as malaria, west-nile virus, equine encephilitis, etc, which had been all but irradicated in the US. The return of bed-bugs as a common pest. Millions die in the third world now, from the effects of these diseases.

    Another shining example of junk-science used by the “environmental” left to “solve” an environmental issue, and creating untold sufferring and woe to countless human beings in the process.

  9. Steve Thomas
    June 16, 2011 at 9:24 am

    Oh, and just for the record: I am happy lead in fuel was banned. Also CFC’s. But telling me what I can and cannot eat goes beyond the pale. Tell me what’s in it, and why I shouldn’t eat it. Let me make the decision as to whether or not I choose to put it in my body. Same goes for tobacco, alcohol, saturated fats, etc.

  10. Steve Thomas
    June 17, 2011 at 1:48 pm

    More data-doctoring: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/research-center-under-fire-for-adjusted-sea-level-data/

Comments are closed.