UPDATE:  It was reported on Channel 7 news tonight that the principal, Dr. Karen Spillman has resigned her position with Stafford County Schools.  That should not come as a surprise.  We can assume the resignation was a forced resignation.   9/27/11   11:30

http://www.wjla.com/articles/2011/09/report-colonial-forge-principal-resigns-after-banana-man-incident–67144.html

There is a little more to the Banana Man story.  After Banana Man was cuffed and headed toward a 10 day suspension, the student body at Colonial Forge came to his defense.  Many T-shirts were made up saying FREE Banana Man.  The administration at the high school forbid the students to wear the shirts and even confiscated some of them.  The ACLU has now come in on behalf of the students of Colonial Forge High School in Stafford and has told administrators in Stafford County that they must allow students to wear their Free Banana Man T-shirts.   The students   had been forbidden to wear Free Banana Man T-shirts prior to ACLU intervention. 

Of course, the school system can choose to ignore the ACLU, if they choose.  The principal is Dr. Karen Spillman, former principal in Prince William County.  She certainly is not getting community support or the support of her boss, as we shall learn later.  In fact, Dr. Spillman has quite a record for stirring things up and turning a 1 into a 10 when there is no need for a 10. 

Leaving My Marc  Blog  tells quite the story.  Apparently this isn’t Dr. Spillman’s first brush with controversy.  Remember the reporter who was arrested over the ducks at Woodbridge High School a number of years ago?  It seems that one Dr. Karen Spillman was involved in that debacle also.  Leaving My Marc reports the following from Freedomforum.org: [Editor’s note- the Kelly Campbell story is a number of years old.]

Reporter Kelly Campbell went to school last week to finish up a feature on baby ducks and wound up in handcuffs and cooling her heels at a police station.

Students no doubt will be heartened to see someone besides themselves suffer under “zero-tolerance” policies afflicting the nation’s schools these days. But the reporter’s arrest raises legitimate questions about the ability of the press to perform its constitutional role and about the dismissive attitude of many government officials toward public accountability.

It all started when a photographer for the Potomac News in Prince William County, Va., saw a young person with a duckling at a baseball game last week and took a photo. She found out that the duck was part of a class assignment at Woodbridge High School.

In reporting a story to go with the photo, Campbell learned that biology teacher Douglas Pinion had 100 students take home two-day-old ducklings in an experiment about how they might “imprint” on the humans. She also encountered wildlife experts and some students and parents who expressed concerns about the welfare of the ducks. Her calls to the school to get further information were not returned. So she went to the school, where Principal Karen Spillman invited her into her office for an interview.

Shortly after the interview began, Spillman suddenly called it to a halt. The reporter wanted to know why. During the back and forth between the principal and the reporter, a man wearing a high school marching band jacket entered the principal’s office to say he was leaving for the day. The principal asked him to wait because she might need help removing the reporter, even though she had not asked Campbell directly to leave. Before Campbell could leave willingly, the man took her by the arm and started ushering her out.

Campbell recounted later: “I said, ‘What are you doing?’ and he said, ‘Arresting you.’ I said, ‘Who are you?’ ” At that point, the man pulled up his band jacket to reveal a county police logo on his knit shirt. John Chapman, a Prince William County police officer, was on duty at the school, wearing what a department spokesperson termed “a relaxed uniform.”

Officer Chapman handcuffed the reporter and took her to the police station, where she spent two hours before being charged with misdemeanor criminal trespass and driven back to her car at the school. Her editor and publisher had come to the station but were not allowed to see her.

“Our reporter was caught off guard by the principal ending the interview,” said Campbell’s editor, Susan Svihlik. “Expressing surprise and hesitation is not against the law, nor is it trespass.”

After the arrest, Kelly Campbell went back to the newsroom and wrote her baby ducks article, which was published in the Potomac News on June 8. The next day, a story about her arrest, written by a newsroom colleague, appeared in the newspaper.

Campbell is scheduled to appear in court July 31 on trespass charges carrying a penalty of up to a year in jail and $2,500 fine.

Leaders of state and national press organizations quickly issued statements of concern about the arrest.

Louise Seals, president of the Virginia pro chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists and managing editor of the Richmond Times-Dispatch, noted that press relations with education and police officials in Virginia are usually quite good. She expressed hope that this issue could be resolved without going to court. The state SPJ will support the Potomac News reporter in her legal fight if necessary, Seals added. “A reporter has to be able to ask questions without fear of being arrested.”

“We hope that this was a one-time error of judgment that won’t be repeated,” said Ray Marcano, SPJ’s national president and assistant managing editor at the Dayton (Ohio) Daily News.

“Reporters simply should not be arrested for doing their job,” said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “Apparently, Ms. Campbell was arrested for doing what all good reporters are trained to do. She was thrown in jail for asking: ‘Why?’ “

The arrest of Kelly Campbell while interviewing a high school principal for a relatively innocuous story is just one more in a string of recent examples of public officials’ hostility toward journalists trying to keep the people informed about their own government.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer publicly scolded a reporter and told him his question about the president’s daughters’ scrapes with the law had been “noted in the building.” Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura tried to force reporters covering him to wear press passes identifying them as “official jackals.” Cleveland Mayor Michael R. White held a press conference in a public school but made it “invitation only” and barred two reporters from Cleveland’s The Plain Dealer. U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., targeted The Courier-Journal of Louisville in an opinion poll paid for by campaign funds.

The list goes on.

Hijinks? Payback? Or a fundamental misunderstanding of or disdain for the press’s role in a democratic society?

At the least, the arrest of Kelly Campbell is just one more example of public officials — in this case a high school principal and a county police officer — punishing reporters who ask questions they don’t want to answer.

But this is not just about an aggressive reporter or impertinent questions. It is about a siege mentality on the part of some school officials and an insularity that ill-equips them to teach our children how to deal with the vagaries of life in a democracy. It wouldn’t hurt if they visited their own schools’ civics classes from time to time.

Unless school officials react with the Constitution and common sense in mind when a nosy reporter shows up, they risk teaching the wrong lesson to students and their parents: If you ask a question that makes anyone uncomfortable, you may find yourself on a field trip to jail.

Frustration with reporters who are unduly critical or aggressive is understandable. But there are ways to handle that frustration short of criminal charges. In this instance, the reporter was invited by a public official into her office to do an interview about a matter of public concern.

Rather than being able to put the finishing touches on a routine story, Kelly Campbell wound up facing a year in jail for the “crime” of trying to get the principal’s responses to legitimate questions posed on behalf of taxpayers, parents and students.

Holy cow.  Talk about getting out a cannon to kill a fly!  Ms. Campbell had every right to ask some questions and she should have been warned.  Karen Spillman was appointed Area Superintendent after leaving Woodbridge High School.  She left PWC from that position in 2004.  Her departure was not of her own accord, inside sources have stated.  It appears that Spillman does not have the support of her boss and that her judgement has been publicly questioned.  From potomaclocal.com:

Late Friday afternoon, Stafford County Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Randy Bridges said Spillman’s attempt to stop students from wearing t-shirts stating “free banana man” was uncalled for.

“We have concluded that many of the actions taken by the school were inappropriate. We are sorry for any embarrassment or inconvenience incurred by the students who were appropriately exercising their freedom of speech and by the families of those students,” said Bridges.

Bridges went onto say the school system supports students’ rights to free speech.

After he ran down the field in costume, Thompson was placed in handcuffs and detained by the sheriff’s department, was later released but was never charged with a crime.

Thompson was also suspended from school for 10 days but later had the suspension dropped.

According to reports, Spillman was in the spotlight 10 years agowhen she was principal of Woodbridge Senior High School and had a local newspaper reporter arrested after meeting with her in her office.

People might want to put their ears to the ground to find out why Karen Spillman left Prince William County.  Some of her old skeletons may have come back to haunt her.  I would start asking questions up here in Prince William if I lived in Stafford County.

 

9 Thoughts to “Blatant over-reaction to school prank puts former PWC principal in the hot seat”

  1. Elena

    Very good! I remember in middle school, some of the girls put color hairspray as highlights. The principle called the parents mothers to come get them from school, my mother had a fit. She said it was ridiculous to call her into school over hair color and that she would NOT be taking me home. She suggested the school focus on more serious issues facing students than hair color.

    I would say the same about this student. I imagine this boy has made more friends than he could have ever hoped. If he has some autistic issues, social skill deficits can make it challenging to make friends, this Principle may have done him a huge favor in widening his social cirlce.

    Great find Moon, sounds like maybe its time for her to retire as an educator!

  2. Elena

    I will add, if ONLY we those types of reporter today in PWC, that would be great, hard hitting, investigative, go getter………ahhhh, the old days.

  3. Theseus

    Elena – I agree completely but it’s not going to happen. “Newspapers,” including their online versions, focus today more on cash flow than news. They feature worthless fluff pieces rather than investigations of what’s going on in the community. Look at InsideNova almost any day. The stories are virtually all crime and sports. They’ve even resorted to regularly showing mug shots. They think that’s how to boost readership and sell advertising. Maybe they’re right, but they are demonstrating no journalistic integrity and certainly not fulfilling their responsibility to keep the community informed. They’re not going to look under the rug locally because that would reveal things like Corey Stewart’s corrupt dealings with developers. Also, they suppress that sort of reporting because they want the advertising revenue from the real estate industry and related businesses in the County.

    The “Washington Post” would have gone under long ago if not for the for-profit education company Kaplan that owns them. Kaplan is doing well because it has learned how to milk the Federal education subsidy racket. They’ve made an industry out of recruiting students, cashing in on Federal subsidies for higher education, and then sending the students on their way. Their students’ graduation, employment and loan pay-back rates are far below those of community colleges and other not-for-profit schools who haven’t figured out how to suck taxpayers dry as Kaplan has. This system is keeping the “Washington Post” afloat a little longer.

    I’ll credit the “Post,” however, in that they did run an article not long ago critical of the for-profit education industry and even pointed out some of the problems with their parent company, Kaplan. Do you think we will ever see a local story on Corey’s corruption? P*** off the developers and Prince William Association of Realtors who have already paid in advance for the PWC Board of Supervisors that’s going to be elected next November? See a story critical of Stewart, Covington, Nohe, Jenkins or Candland? Don’t hold your breath.

    Moonhowlings criticizes FOX all the time but I would venture that the problem is much worse at the local level. Nationally, I think FOX news is a good thing. It provides a perspective on national and international events that was intentionally neglected by the broadcast media for decades. Moreover, we have CNN, MSNBC, PBS, the networks and others to call BS on each other and provide some competition of views. I think that’s all great.

    Locally, we have nothing. As I wrote above, it’s just fluff, sports and crime and no reporting whatsoever of the real news. Just as Corey and gang do what their paymasters demand, the local “media” won’t make waves and threaten their sources of revenue. Not only do have no competition for news, we have no news at all.

  4. I think Fox News is a horrible thing because they are not honest and they are extremely biased. How will anyone learn anything from being spoon-fed what you want to hear?

    I don’t know about you, Theseus, but I heard about things discussed on Fox for years but I think I heard facts not Roger Ailes puke. Have you ever listened to MSNBC in the morning? I would say not or you would not be saying what you are saying now. Many of those on Morning Joe are conservatives. Unless of course you are ready to tell me that Pat Buchanan isn’t conservative. The Morning Joe is fair and balanced. Their guests are conservative, liberal, moderate, pick a day. The discussion is lively most days.

    I would not attack Fox News if they were honest. They do some things real well. But the luring with legs and cleavage, the restating and pushing opinion during real news —that is uncalled for. Having some nut job who calls the president a racist and I believe a traitor for 2 years? Unacceptable. The evening shows? You know that is commentary. The news you expect to be clean. It isn’t.

    PBS is continually under fire and has very little news. Masterpiece Theater and Downton Abbey are out there liberalizing the American mind. I am really looking forward to watching American Experience and Prohibition this fall. God forbid that my mind should rot from such liberal claptrap. I still burn over the political attack on PBS

    Locally we do have nothing. I will agree. Perhaps that is our own fault for not supporting a local newspaper. How many of us dropped subscription once they went online? On the other hand, perhaps they had a poor business model. Perhaps they needed to cut back to twice a week with a good paper instead of 7 days of a rag that has no follow up or letters to the editor.

  5. Where are all our conservatives now? There has been a firing. Why aren’t you all dancing around with glee? School personnel fired. In this case, it was very warranted. She didn’t piss off the tea party, she pissed off the community and her bosses by mishandling a situation.

  6. Clinton S. Long

    I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood. Since I am new here, I am not sure why there is a conservative vs. liberal thing here. I don’t think poor judgement, bad decisions or odd thinking is reserved for whether one is conservative or liberal. I think both are capable so why is this brought up?

    Looking for an education.

  7. Oh Clinton, now I understand what you are referring to. Most of our conservatives were willing to fire the teacher who called the teaparty panel Nazis.

    I agree you about stupidity running across the political spectrum fairly evenly.

    I just was asking them where their comments were on this article since they wanted someone fired.

  8. Clinton S. Long

    thanks for the explanation. I am sorry to interject. I did not understand.

    1. @Clinton

      No problem at all. Please don’t apologize. It was confusing, especially to someone who hasn’t kicked around with all of us for long.

      I am glad you are here, Clinton. I will resist asking if you are any kin to my favorite Clinton, Bill. 👿

Comments are closed.