Washingtonpost.com:
An Oklahoma inmate who was supposed to be executed Tuesday instead died of a heart attack after the execution was botched, state officials said.
Clayton Lockett’s execution Tuesday night was halted after about 20 minutes due to an issue with a vein, the Associated Press reported. Not long after Lockett was deemed unconscious from the first of three drugs, he began “writhing on the gurney,” according to the Associated Press. He was declared dead 43 minutes after the execution began.
Lockett and Charles F. Warner were both supposed to be executed Tuesday night, Lockett at 6 p.m. and Warner at 8 p.m. After the botched execution, Warner’s execution has been stayed for two weeks. Lockett was convicted of shooting a teenager and watching as she was buried alive; Warner was convicted of raping and murdering his girlfriend’s 11-month-old baby.
The attorney for Warner had criticized the use of an experimental new drug protocol in the execution earlier on Tuesday.
Not to be overly simplistic here but how hard is it to kill people humanely? Don’t get me wrong. The descriptions of what these two were sentenced to death for doesn’t engender pity or sympathy from me. One of them writhes in pain? Boo-effen-hoo. What did their victims do?
My problem surrounding all this “botched execution” stems from the idea that we, as a society, need to be better, far better, than those we are legally killing. We somehow manage to put down our pets humanely, when their time has come. Why can’t those on death row just be “put to sleep?” Surely this isn’t such a difficult process.